🔗 Share this article

In contemporary Britain, public demonstration is no longer a basic freedom. Instead, it has become a privilege that authorities grant or withhold at their discretion. This constitutes the underlying meaning of new regulations that the ruling administration is advancing, which would dictate the timing and location demonstrations can take place, with potential imprisonment for those who defy these restrictions.

Gradual Weakening of Democratic Rights

Earlier administrations had already weakened this fundamental freedom: the former Conservative government had granted law enforcement extensive new authorities, which international human rights organizations had censured as "serious and undue limitations" on civil liberties. Collectively, these progressive attacks on liberty have practically eliminated the hard-won right to public demonstration.

Exploiting Atrocity to Justify Suppression

The latest limitations are being defended by referring to last week's heinous antisemitic assault on a Manchester Islamic center. We can all agree on universal agreement that the safety of British Jews must be safeguarded. However, using this horrific incident as a justification to stifle opposition is not only unrelated to that duty but distorts it.

"When you can't draw the line at genocide, you probably cannot establish limits at democratic principles," commented a well-known American author, whose words that rings true for the current government.

Historical Context of Demonstration

Consider Britain's long tradition of public demonstration and direct action against racial discrimination and fascism, from the 1936 Battle of Cable Street to after World War II Jewish anti-fascist movements and the 1970s mobilizations against the National Front. Many of these early protesters were labeled as extremists in their era, even while they were fighting for the freedoms of minorities.

Current Reality

In today's complex situation, here's what's actually occurring: The Israeli government – a foreign state – is perpetrating acts that international bodies have described as systematic destruction. Its military actions have prompted the International Criminal Court to issue arrest warrants against Israel's prime minister and his ex-military leader.

International public opinion has shifted dramatically against Israel's military campaign. In Britain, a large percentage of citizens believe Israel has likely committed international law violations. Most people would support a total prohibition on arms sales to the nation, and back the detention of Netanyahu.

Silencing Dissent

Having essentially lost the argument, Israel's supporters are now exploiting a vile antisemitic crime to try to suppress a popular campaign against a ethical disaster. The British government appears to be involved in this effort. Ministers have not enacted comprehensive sanctions on Israel and have allowed arms exports to continue.

People who are protesting against the erasure of Gaza have been characterized as hateful extremists. Yet there's a important factor why there hasn't been a broader crackdown on these protesters until now: very limited protesters have made truly offensive statements about Jewish people, giving police authorities little justification to take action.

Dangerous Conflation

Merging Jewish heritage with the policies of the government of Israel is not only cynical but also harmful. The official definition of antisemitism, adopted by the British government and many organizations, has been rightly questioned for potentially stifling legitimate criticism of Israel. However, there should be no disagreement about one of its central illustrations: that "holding Jewish people generally accountable for actions of the state of Israel" constitutes antisemitism.

Escalating Restrictions

This is why we've arrived at a point where police authorities can propose that demonstrations criticizing Israel's policies should be called off because they might "accidentally or intentionally" support antisemitism. Similarly, government officials have declared that acknowledgment of Palestinian statehood has made organizations "implicated" in supposed mistreatment experienced by Jewish communities.

Double Standards

On the very day as the religious center assault, the Israel's army killed numerous of Palestinian civilians in Gaza – adding to the horrific toll from two years of daily atrocities that have claimed tens of thousands of human lives. British politicians and media outlets have hardly hidden the limited value they attach to Palestinian existence. This represents one of the most brazen demonstrations of racism in contemporary society.

Breaking Boundaries

Our government has already passed a concerning boundary by proscribing a specific activist group, a peaceful, human rights-focused direct action organization. Thousands of British protesters have been detained, primarily for carrying signs opposing genocide and endorsing the proscribed group. Many of those detained are pensioners; among them a retired priest and the child of a Holocaust survivor.

Global Comparisons

It's not difficult to see where this path leads. In the United States, political leaders helped demonize pro-Palestinian protests: a ex-political leader suggested that some were "connected to" foreign governments, while the current president described such protests as antisemitic. In doing so, they helped legitimize the authoritarian crackdown on such demonstrations – and on free speech in general.

Future Concerns

If a conservative administration comes to power, it would be granted sweeping powers to control dissent. What might a new administration do with this repressive toolkit? Our forebears struggled, endured hardship and sacrificed their lives to establish our freedoms. We may eventually regret how easily we allowed them to slip away.